Re: [PATCH 1/3 V2] ring-buffer: Have nested events still record running time stamp

2020-06-29 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:52:25 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" > > Up until now, if an event is interrupted while it is recorded by an > interrupt, and that interrupt records events, the time of those events will > all be the same. This is because events only record

Re: [PATCH 1/3 V2] ring-buffer: Have nested events still record running time stamp

2020-06-29 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:49:19 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Looks good to me :) > > Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu Thanks Masami! I added a more general description to the design which makes more sense in English terms, before going into the more detailed pseudo implementation of the design.

[PATCH 1/3 V2] ring-buffer: Have nested events still record running time stamp

2020-06-28 Thread Steven Rostedt
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" Up until now, if an event is interrupted while it is recorded by an interrupt, and that interrupt records events, the time of those events will all be the same. This is because events only record the delta of the time since the previous event (or beginning of a pag