Hi Bart,
On 10/02/2017 10:11 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 11:52 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> Currently UFS HCI uses UFS_BIT() macro to get various bit
>> position for the hardware registers status bits. Which makes
>> code longer instead of shorter. This macro does not improv
On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 11:52 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Currently UFS HCI uses UFS_BIT() macro to get various bit
> position for the hardware registers status bits. Which makes
> code longer instead of shorter. This macro does not improve
> code readability as well.
> Lets re-write these macro defi
Currently UFS HCI uses UFS_BIT() macro to get various bit
position for the hardware registers status bits. Which makes
code longer instead of shorter. This macro does not improve
code readability as well.
Lets re-write these macro definition with the actual bit position.
Suggested-by: Bart Van Ass
3 matches
Mail list logo