On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Are they in 3.9.0-0.rc5.git2.1.f19? I'm seeing a regression from 3.8.5 with
>> the radeon driver not finding BIOS ROM as well.
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949
On Apr 2, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Matthew Garrett
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 11:39 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>>> Chris still has problems (see
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927451), but I don't know
>>> whether the
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Apr 2, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Matthew Garrett
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 11:39 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>
Chris still has problems (see
https://bugzilla.redhat
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Matthew Garrett
wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 11:39 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
>> Chris still has problems (see
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927451), but I don't know
>> whether they are related to these patches or something else.
>
> I think
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 11:39 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Chris still has problems (see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927451), but I don't know
> whether they are related to these patches or something else.
I think they're unrelated. The log he posts using this patch gives the
cor
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> On 2013-03-27 22:33, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Matthew Garrett
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 16:53 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>
I've been on vacation and didn't follow this closely, but it seem
On 2013-03-27 22:33, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Matthew Garrett
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 16:53 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>>> I've been on vacation and didn't follow this closely, but it seems
>>> like this fixes a regression and should be merged before v3
[+cc linux-pci]
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Mantas, Chris]
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Matthew Garrett
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 16:53 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>>> I've been on vacation and didn't follow this closely, but it seems
>>> like
[+cc Mantas, Chris]
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Matthew Garrett
wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 16:53 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
>> I've been on vacation and didn't follow this closely, but it seems
>> like this fixes a regression and should be merged before v3.9, right?
>> Can you include
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 16:53 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I've been on vacation and didn't follow this closely, but it seems
> like this fixes a regression and should be merged before v3.9, right?
> Can you include a reference to a bugzilla or the mailing list
> discussion in the changelog? I can
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Matthew Garrett
wrote:
> It turns out that some UEFI systems provide apparently an apparently valid
> PCI ROM BAR that turns out to contain garbage, so the attempt in f4eb5ff05
> to prefer the ROM from the BAR actually breaks a different set of machines.
> As Linus
It turns out that some UEFI systems provide apparently an apparently valid
PCI ROM BAR that turns out to contain garbage, so the attempt in f4eb5ff05
to prefer the ROM from the BAR actually breaks a different set of machines.
As Linus pointed out, the graphics drivers are probably in the best
posit
12 matches
Mail list logo
