On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 02:16:35PM +0800, Zefan Li wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> Could you pick up those bug fixes? Or should I ask Ingo/akpm to take
> care of them?
Sorry about the delay. Applied to cgroup/for-4.0-fixes. Will push
out in a week.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: s
Hi Tejun,
Could you pick up those bug fixes? Or should I ask Ingo/akpm to take
care of them?
On 2015/2/13 11:19, Zefan Li wrote:
> If clone_children is enabled, effective masks won't be initialized
> due to the bug:
>
> # mount -t cgroup -o cpuset xxx /mnt
> # echo 1 > cgroup.clone_children
Quoting Zefan Li (lize...@huawei.com):
> If clone_children is enabled, effective masks won't be initialized
> due to the bug:
>
> # mount -t cgroup -o cpuset xxx /mnt
> # echo 1 > cgroup.clone_children
> # mkdir /mnt/tmp
> # cat /mnt/tmp/
> # cat cpuset.effective_cpus
>
> # cat cpuset
From: Jason Low
The cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level can control how far we do
immediate load balancing on a system. However, it was found on recent
kernels that echo'ing a value into cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
did not reduce any immediate load balancing.
The reason this occurred was because
If clone_children is enabled, effective masks won't be initialized
due to the bug:
# mount -t cgroup -o cpuset xxx /mnt
# echo 1 > cgroup.clone_children
# mkdir /mnt/tmp
# cat /mnt/tmp/
# cat cpuset.effective_cpus
# cat cpuset.cpus
0-15
And then this cpuset won't constrain the task
5 matches
Mail list logo