Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/numa: set numa_off to false when numa node is fake

2020-07-06 Thread David Hildenbrand
Andrew Morton ; Mike Rapoport >> ; Baoquan He ; Chuhong Yuan >> ; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux- >> ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@kvack.org; Kaly Xin >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/numa: set numa_off to false when numa node >> is fake >&g

Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/numa: set numa_off to false when numa node is fake

2020-07-06 Thread Jonathan Cameron
; > ; Andrew Morton ; Mike > > Rapoport ; Baoquan He ; Chuhong Yuan > > ; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux- > > ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@kvack.org; Kaly Xin > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/numa: set numa_off to false when numa node > > is fak

RE: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/numa: set numa_off to false when numa node is fake

2020-07-06 Thread Justin He
sts.infradead.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@kvack.org; Kaly Xin > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/numa: set numa_off to false when numa node > is fake > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:29:21 +0100 > Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 09:19:45 +0800

RE: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/numa: set numa_off to false when numa node is fake

2020-07-06 Thread Justin He
uan > ; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@kvack.org; Kaly Xin > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/numa: set numa_off to false when numa node > is fake > > On 06.07.20 03:19, Jia He wrote: > > Previously, numa_off is set to true unconditionally

Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/numa: set numa_off to false when numa node is fake

2020-07-06 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:29:21 +0100 Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 09:19:45 +0800 > Jia He wrote: > > Hi, > > > Previously, numa_off is set to true unconditionally in dummy_numa_init(), > > even if there is a fake numa node. > > > > But acpi will translate node id to NUMA_NO_NODE(

Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/numa: set numa_off to false when numa node is fake

2020-07-06 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 09:19:45 +0800 Jia He wrote: Hi, > Previously, numa_off is set to true unconditionally in dummy_numa_init(), > even if there is a fake numa node. > > But acpi will translate node id to NUMA_NO_NODE(-1) in acpi_map_pxm_to_node() > because it regards numa_off as turning off the

Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/numa: set numa_off to false when numa node is fake

2020-07-06 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 06.07.20 03:19, Jia He wrote: > Previously, numa_off is set to true unconditionally in dummy_numa_init(), > even if there is a fake numa node. > > But acpi will translate node id to NUMA_NO_NODE(-1) in acpi_map_pxm_to_node() > because it regards numa_off as turning off the numa node. > > Witho

[PATCH 1/3] arm64/numa: set numa_off to false when numa node is fake

2020-07-05 Thread Jia He
Previously, numa_off is set to true unconditionally in dummy_numa_init(), even if there is a fake numa node. But acpi will translate node id to NUMA_NO_NODE(-1) in acpi_map_pxm_to_node() because it regards numa_off as turning off the numa node. Without this patch, pmem can't be probed as a RAM de