On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 05:02:21PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.10.2020 16:59, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 4:10 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>
> >> On 14.10.2020 19:53, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> >>> @@ -76,7 +80,9 @@ config XEN_DEBUG_FS
> >>> Enabling this option may inc
On 15.10.2020 16:59, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 4:10 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 14.10.2020 19:53, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>>> @@ -76,7 +80,9 @@ config XEN_DEBUG_FS
>>> Enabling this option may incur a significant performance overhead.
>>>
>>> config XEN_PVH
>>> -
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 4:10 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 14.10.2020 19:53, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > @@ -76,7 +80,9 @@ config XEN_DEBUG_FS
> > Enabling this option may incur a significant performance overhead.
> >
> > config XEN_PVH
> > - bool "Support for running as a Xen PVH guest"
On 14.10.2020 19:53, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> @@ -76,7 +80,9 @@ config XEN_DEBUG_FS
> Enabling this option may incur a significant performance overhead.
>
> config XEN_PVH
> - bool "Support for running as a Xen PVH guest"
> + bool "Xen PVH guest support"
Tangential question: Is "g
A Xen PVH domain doesn't have a PCI bus or devices, so it doesn't need
PCI support built in. Currently, XEN_PVH depends on XEN_PVHVM which
depends on PCI.
Introduce XEN_PVHVM_GUEST as a toplevel item and change XEN_PVHVM to a
hidden variable. This allows XEN_PVH to depend on XEN_PVHVM without PC
5 matches
Mail list logo