Am 12.02.19 um 12:57 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, Jan H. Schönherr wrote:
Am 29.01.2019 um 11:23 schrieb Jan H. Schönherr:
+calibrate:
+ /*
+* Extrapolate the error and fail fast if the error will
+* never be b
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, Jan H. Schönherr wrote:
>
> > Am 29.01.2019 um 11:23 schrieb Jan H. Schönherr:
> > > +calibrate:
> > > + /*
> > > + * Extrapolate the error and fail fast if the error will
> > > + * never be below 500 ppm.
> > > + */
> > > + if
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, Jan H. Schönherr wrote:
> Am 29.01.2019 um 11:23 schrieb Jan H. Schönherr:
> > +calibrate:
> > + /*
> > +* Extrapolate the error and fail fast if the error will
> > +* never be below 500 ppm.
> > +*/
> > + if (d1 + d1 >= (delta * MAX_QUICK_PIT_ITERATIONS) >> 11
Some systems experience regular interruptions (60 Hz SMI?), that prevent
the quick PIT calibration from succeeding: individual interruptions can be
so long, that the PIT MSB is observed to decrement by 2 or 3 instead of 1.
The existing code cannot recover from this.
The system in question is an AM
4 matches
Mail list logo