On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:04:40PM -0700, Tim Merrifield wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review, Kirill.
>
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 03:19:54PM +0300, Kirill A . Shutemov wrote:
> > Hm. Per-thread flag is odd. I think it should be per-process.
>
> This is the only point I might need some clarification
Thanks for the review, Kirill.
On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 03:19:54PM +0300, Kirill A . Shutemov wrote:
> Hm. Per-thread flag is odd. I think it should be per-process.
This is the only point I might need some clarification on. I agree
there doesn't seem to be much value in allowing per-thread contr
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 11:36:00PM +, Tim Merrifield wrote:
> Add a new prctl option to enable/disable user-level hypercalls when
> running in a confidential VM. Add support for checking this flag on
> VMCALL #VE for TDX and transfer control to a hypervisor
> vendor-specific handler.
>
> Signe
Add a new prctl option to enable/disable user-level hypercalls when
running in a confidential VM. Add support for checking this flag on
VMCALL #VE for TDX and transfer control to a hypervisor
vendor-specific handler.
Signed-off-by: Tim Merrifield
---
arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c| 18 +
4 matches
Mail list logo
