From: Joseph Salisbury Sent: Friday,
April 16, 2021 5:43 PM
>
> This patch makes no functional changes. It simply moves hv_do_rep_hypercall()
> out of arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h and into asm-generic/mshyperv.h
>
> hv_do_rep_hypercall() is architecture independent, so it makes sense that i
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 02:42:55PM +, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Wei Liu Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2021 6:09 AM
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 05:43:02PM -0700, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> > > From: Joseph Salisbury
> > >
> > > This patch makes no functional changes. It simply moves
> > > hv_do
From: Wei Liu Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2021 6:09 AM
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 05:43:02PM -0700, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> > From: Joseph Salisbury
> >
> > This patch makes no functional changes. It simply moves
> > hv_do_rep_hypercall()
> > out of arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h and into asm-gen
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 05:43:02PM -0700, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> From: Joseph Salisbury
>
> This patch makes no functional changes. It simply moves hv_do_rep_hypercall()
> out of arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h and into asm-generic/mshyperv.h
>
> hv_do_rep_hypercall() is architecture indepen
From: Joseph Salisbury
This patch makes no functional changes. It simply moves hv_do_rep_hypercall()
out of arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h and into asm-generic/mshyperv.h
hv_do_rep_hypercall() is architecture independent, so it makes sense that it
should be in the architecture independent mshy
5 matches
Mail list logo