Re: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep

2014-01-06 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 04:28:31PM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > On 01/02/2014 04:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:11 PM, John Stultz wrote: > >> Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead > >> use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep > >> enabled seq

Re: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep

2014-01-03 Thread John Stultz
On 01/02/2014 04:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:11 PM, John Stultz wrote: >> Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead >> use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep >> enabled seqcount methods. >> >> This also adds raw_ methods for the write operatio

Re: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep

2014-01-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:11 PM, John Stultz wrote: > Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead > use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep > enabled seqcount methods. > > This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations > as well, which will be utilized in a following p

Re: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep

2014-01-02 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 01/02/14 15:11, John Stultz wrote: > Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead > use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep > enabled seqcount methods. > > This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations > as well, which will be utilized in a following patch. > > Cc:

[PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep

2014-01-02 Thread John Stultz
Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep enabled seqcount methods. This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations as well, which will be utilized in a following patch. Cc: Krzysztof Hałasa Cc: Uwe Kleine-König Cc: Willy Ta