On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 12/09/16 08:03, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22/11/16 21:35, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Frank Rowand
wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>
>
On 12/09/16 08:03, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22/11/16 21:35, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Frank Rowand
>>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
This patch adds a function that leads to conflating the "model"
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 22/11/16 21:35, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Frank Rowand
>> wrote:
>
>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> This patch adds a function that leads to conflating the "model" property
>>> and the "compatible" property. This le
On 22/11/16 18:44, Frank Rowand wrote:
Hi Rob,
[...]
This patch adds a function that leads to conflating the "model"
property and the "compatible" property. This leads to opaque,
confusing and unclear code where ever it is used. I think it is
not good for the device tree framework to con
On 22/11/16 21:35, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
[...]
This patch adds a function that leads to conflating the "model" property
and the "compatible" property. This leads to opaque, confusing and unclear
code where ever it is used. I think it is
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 11/18/16 12:00, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 11/18/16 06:46, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 03:32:54PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
repl
Hi Rob,
On 11/18/16 12:00, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 11/18/16 06:46, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 03:32:54PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
>>> replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference
On 11/21/16 11:24, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 11/21/16 08:23, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21/11/16 16:05, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> Hi Sudeep,
>>>
>>> On 11/18/16 12:22, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 11/18/16 02:41, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 17/11/16 21:00, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> O
On 11/21/16 08:20, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 18/11/16 20:22, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 11/18/16 02:41, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17/11/16 21:00, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 11/17/16 07:32, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
On 11/21/16 08:23, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 21/11/16 16:05, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> Hi Sudeep,
>>
>> On 11/18/16 12:22, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> On 11/18/16 02:41, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 17/11/16 21:00, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 11/17/16 07:32, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Curre
On 21/11/16 16:05, Frank Rowand wrote:
Hi Sudeep,
On 11/18/16 12:22, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 11/18/16 02:41, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 17/11/16 21:00, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 11/17/16 07:32, Sudeep Holla wrote:
Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
replicating
On 18/11/16 20:22, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 11/18/16 02:41, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 17/11/16 21:00, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 11/17/16 07:32, Sudeep Holla wrote:
Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF refer
Hi Sudeep,
On 11/18/16 12:22, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 11/18/16 02:41, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17/11/16 21:00, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> On 11/17/16 07:32, Sudeep Holla wrote:
Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
replicating the same snippet of code
On 11/18/16 02:41, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 17/11/16 21:00, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 11/17/16 07:32, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
>>> replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference
>>> counting is either m
On 11/18/16 06:46, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 03:32:54PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
>> replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference
>> counting is either missing or incorrect.
>>
>> Th
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 03:32:54PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
> replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference
> counting is either missing or incorrect.
>
> This patch adds support to read the machine mo
On 17/11/16 21:00, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 11/17/16 07:32, Sudeep Holla wrote:
Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference
counting is either missing or incorrect.
This patch adds support to read the
On 11/17/16 13:00, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 11/17/16 07:32, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
>> replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference
>> counting is either missing or incorrect.
>>
>> This patch adds support
On 11/17/16 07:32, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
> replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference
> counting is either missing or incorrect.
>
> This patch adds support to read the machine model name either using
>
Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference
counting is either missing or incorrect.
This patch adds support to read the machine model name either using
the "model" or the "compatible" property in the de
20 matches
Mail list logo
