> > WS> Doesn't the non-DT case need fixing, too?
> >
> > Arguably yes.
>
> Yes, and it's also a one line fix. Should I do it in a separate
> patch or should I change this one and resubmit?
Resubmit please.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 09.10.2013 08:14, ext Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> "WS" == Wolfram Sang writes:
>
> WS> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
>>> If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
>>> -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
>>> module again to get it
> "WS" == Wolfram Sang writes:
WS> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
>> If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
>> -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
>> module again to get it working.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu
WS> Doesn't t
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
> If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
> -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
> module again to get it working.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu
Doesn't the non-DT case need fixing, too?
> ---
> driver
> "IN" == Ionut Nicu writes:
IN> If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
IN> -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
IN> module again to get it working.
IN> Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu
Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard
--
Sorry about disclaimer - It's out of my contro
If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
-EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
module again to get it working.
Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu
---
drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes
6 matches
Mail list logo