On 10/18/2013 11:03 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On 10/17/2013 04:36 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> On 10/17/2013 04:23 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
Daniel, could please look if this solves your suspend / resume warnings?
>
> Looking very good :)
>
>> dma: cppi41: add suppo
On 10/17/2013 04:23 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> Daniel, could please look if this solves your suspend / resume warnings?
>
> Will do (hopefully) tomorrow. So this is a replacement for my "dma:
> cppi41: move -EAGAIN in tear_down" patch, or does it go on top of it?
I applied your three patches and m
On 10/17/2013 04:20 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 10/17/2013 04:19 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> This patch changes the logic here to look on both queues for the
>> descriptor.
>
> Daniel, could please look if this solves your suspend / resume warnings?
Will do (hopefully) t
On 10/17/2013 04:19 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This patch changes the logic here to look on both queues for the
> descriptor.
Daniel, could please look if this solves your suspend / resume warnings?
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
Most of the logic here is try and error since what actually happens does
not match the trm or I miss read it.
My first assumption was that the queue on which the tear-down descriptor
completes (their own complete queue vs "active descriptor" complete
queue) depends on the transfer direction. This s
5 matches
Mail list logo
