Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: s/CGRP_CLONE_CHILDREN/CGRP_CPUSET_CLONE_CHILDREN/

2012-11-18 Thread Li Zefan
On 2012/11/14 4:27, Tejun Heo wrote: >>From 6e405c1ae4018d813e8ed9e0bd463d6976aebfa8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tejun Heo > Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:21:50 -0800 > > clone_children is only meaningful for cpuset and will stay that way. > Rename the flag to reflect that and update documentati

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: s/CGRP_CLONE_CHILDREN/CGRP_CPUSET_CLONE_CHILDREN/

2012-11-14 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Tejun Heo (t...@kernel.org): > From 6e405c1ae4018d813e8ed9e0bd463d6976aebfa8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tejun Heo > Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:21:50 -0800 > > clone_children is only meaningful for cpuset and will stay that way. > Rename the flag to reflect that and update documentati

[PATCH 1/2] cgroup: s/CGRP_CLONE_CHILDREN/CGRP_CPUSET_CLONE_CHILDREN/

2012-11-13 Thread Tejun Heo
>From 6e405c1ae4018d813e8ed9e0bd463d6976aebfa8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:21:50 -0800 clone_children is only meaningful for cpuset and will stay that way. Rename the flag to reflect that and update documentation. Also, drop clone_children() wrapper in cgro