Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: remove BIO_EOPNOTSUPP

2015-05-19 Thread Jens Axboe
On 05/19/2015 12:39 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Jens, do these two patche look fine to you? Yep, nice and simple, applied both. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info a

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: remove BIO_EOPNOTSUPP

2015-05-18 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Jens, do these two patche look fine to you? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: remove BIO_EOPNOTSUPP

2015-04-24 Thread Tejun Heo
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 09:41:01PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Since the big barrier rewrite/removal in 2007 we never fail FLUSH or > FUA requests, which means we can remove the magic BIO_EOPNOTSUPP flag > to help propagating those to the buffer_head layer. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellw

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: remove BIO_EOPNOTSUPP

2015-04-24 Thread Jeff Moyer
Christoph Hellwig writes: > Since the big barrier rewrite/removal in 2007 we never fail FLUSH or > FUA requests, which means we can remove the magic BIO_EOPNOTSUPP flag > to help propagating those to the buffer_head layer. I had a look through the kernel, checking for places where maybe we were

[PATCH 1/2] block: remove BIO_EOPNOTSUPP

2015-04-24 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Since the big barrier rewrite/removal in 2007 we never fail FLUSH or FUA requests, which means we can remove the magic BIO_EOPNOTSUPP flag to help propagating those to the buffer_head layer. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig --- block/bounce.c| 3 --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c| 11 +