On Thu 16-06-16 15:27:35, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 02:20:02PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 14-06-16 11:42:29, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 5c0a85fad949212b3e059692deecdeed74ae7ec7.
> > >
> > > The commit causes ~6% regression in unixbench.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 02:20:02PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 14-06-16 11:42:29, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > This reverts commit 5c0a85fad949212b3e059692deecdeed74ae7ec7.
> >
> > The commit causes ~6% regression in unixbench.
>
> Is the regression fully explained? My understanding from
On Tue 14-06-16 11:42:29, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> This reverts commit 5c0a85fad949212b3e059692deecdeed74ae7ec7.
>
> The commit causes ~6% regression in unixbench.
Is the regression fully explained? My understanding from the email
thread is that this is suspiciously too high. It is not like I
This reverts commit 5c0a85fad949212b3e059692deecdeed74ae7ec7.
The commit causes ~6% regression in unixbench.
Let's revert it for now and consider other solution for reclaim problem
later.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov
Reported-by: "Huang, Ying"
---
include/linux/mm.h | 2 +-
mm/filemap.c
4 matches
Mail list logo