Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow constructor name selection by architecture.

2013-04-22 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 01:39:31PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Looks to me like this has died again. Unless Sam responds shortly, > I'm going to ask for this to be put into the patch system and I'll > just apply it for 3.10 and be done with it. I had preferred it was a solution where

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow constructor name selection by architecture.

2013-04-18 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
Looks to me like this has died again. Unless Sam responds shortly, I'm going to ask for this to be put into the patch system and I'll just apply it for 3.10 and be done with it. On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 06:21:51PM -0400, George G. Davis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow constructor name selection by architecture.

2013-04-01 Thread George G. Davis
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 05:47:38PM -0400, George G. Davis wrote: >> On Jun 6, 2012, at 6:12 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:06:14AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:30:0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow constructor name selection by architecture.

2013-04-01 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 05:47:38PM -0400, George G. Davis wrote: > On Jun 6, 2012, at 6:12 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:06:14AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:30:05PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >>> On Mon, May 28, 2012

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow constructor name selection by architecture.

2013-04-01 Thread George G. Davis
On Jun 6, 2012, at 6:12 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:06:14AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:30:05PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 07:33:37PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote: From: Vincent Sanders >