On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:46:44PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> More and more sub-architectures are using only the irqchip_init
> function. Make the core code call this function if no init_irq field is
> provided in the machine description to remove some boilerplate code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim
On 03/28/2013 03:46 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> More and more sub-architectures are using only the irqchip_init
> function. Make the core code call this function if no init_irq field is
> provided in the machine description to remove some boilerplate code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
Acked-b
More and more sub-architectures are using only the irqchip_init
function. Make the core code call this function if no init_irq field is
provided in the machine description to remove some boilerplate code.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
arch/arm/kernel/irq.c |6 +-
1 file changed, 5 ins
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 01:40:09PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 09:51 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:48:18AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On 03/28/2013 04:41 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>> + if (machine_desc->init_irq)
> >>> + machine_desc-
On 03/28/2013 09:51 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:48:18AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 03/28/2013 04:41 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> + if (machine_desc->init_irq)
>>> + machine_desc->init_irq();
>>> + else
>>> + irqchip_init();
>>
>> The
Le 28/03/2013 16:49, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> On Thursday 28 March 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:25:42PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> if (IS_DEFINED(CONFIG_OF) && !machine_desc->init_irq)
>>> irqchip_init();
>>> else
>>>
On Thursday 28 March 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:25:42PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > if (IS_DEFINED(CONFIG_OF) && !machine_desc->init_irq)
> > irqchip_init();
> > else
> > machine_desc->init_irq();
> >
> > to the sa
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:25:42PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 28 March 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > Better:
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > if (!machine_desc->init_irq)
> > irqchip_init();
> > else
> > #endif
> > machine_desc
On Thursday 28 March 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Better:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> if (!machine_desc->init_irq)
> irqchip_init();
> else
> #endif
> machine_desc->init_irq();
>
> which means we don't even get the test if !OF, and if someone
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:48:18AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 04:41 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > + if (machine_desc->init_irq)
> > + machine_desc->init_irq();
> > + else
> > + irqchip_init();
>
> There needs to be an empty version defined for !OF.
Better:
#
On 03/28/2013 04:41 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> More and more sub-architectures are using only the irqchip_init
> function. Make the core code call this function if no init_irq field is
> provided in the machine description to remove some boilerplate code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
> ---
>
More and more sub-architectures are using only the irqchip_init
function. Make the core code call this function if no init_irq field is
provided in the machine description to remove some boilerplate code.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
arch/arm/kernel/irq.c |6 +-
1 file changed, 5 ins
12 matches
Mail list logo
