Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight

2014-05-07 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 02:53:33PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > The pwm-backlight driver is moving to use the gpiod interface, > which has its own mapping mechanism for platform data GPIOs. > These mappings carry GPIO properties like active low so they don't have > to be explicitly handled by

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight

2014-05-06 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 11:33:00PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Alexandre Courbot wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot > >> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han wrote: > >> >> On Thurs

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight

2014-05-06 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han wrote: >> >> On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Ping, can I h

RE: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight

2014-05-05 Thread Kukjin Kim
Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot > wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han wrote: > >> On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > >>> > >>> Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this > >>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight

2014-04-20 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han wrote: >> On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>> >>> Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this >>> patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used i

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight

2014-04-10 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han wrote: > On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> >> Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this >> patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used in any code, is replaced by >> gpiod, and we would like to remove i

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight

2014-04-10 Thread Jingoo Han
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this > patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used in any code, is replaced by > gpiod, and we would like to remove it altogether from pwm_bl. Thanks! OK, I see. It looks go

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight

2014-04-09 Thread Alexandre Courbot
Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used in any code, is replaced by gpiod, and we would like to remove it altogether from pwm_bl. Thanks! Alex. On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > The pwm-backlight driver

[PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight

2014-02-26 Thread Alexandre Courbot
The pwm-backlight driver is moving to use the gpiod interface, which has its own mapping mechanism for platform data GPIOs. These mappings carry GPIO properties like active low so they don't have to be explicitly handled by GPIO consumers. Because of this change, the enable_gpio_flags member of pl