On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 09:10:23AM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
> > I think David's concern was whether if 0 == false in all situations. It
> > is pretty clear that static memory is initialized to 0.
>
> I'm not 100% sure about that.
> static pointers may be required to
On Mi, 2014-10-08 at 09:10 +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
> > I think David's concern was whether if 0 == false in all situations. It
> > is pretty clear that static memory is initialized to 0.
>
> I'm not 100% sure about that.
> static pointers may be required to be initi
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
> I think David's concern was whether if 0 == false in all situations. It
> is pretty clear that static memory is initialized to 0.
I'm not 100% sure about that.
static pointers may be required to be initialised to NULL.
If NULL isn't the 'all 0 bit pattern' then the mem
> On 07 October 2014 at 22:54 Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
>
>
> On Di, 2014-10-07 at 22:49 +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> >
> > > On 07 October 2014 at 22:33 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:18:32PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > > > From: Fabian Frederick
On Di, 2014-10-07 at 22:49 +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
>
> > On 07 October 2014 at 22:33 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:18:32PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Fabian Frederick
> > > Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:16:36 +0200
> > >
> > > > static values are auto
From: Fabian Frederick
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:49:31 +0200 (CEST)
> Maybe comment should have been "static values are automatically initialized to
> 0" then ?
Yes, that sounds a lot better, please respin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
> On 07 October 2014 at 22:33 Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:18:32PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Fabian Frederick
> > Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:16:36 +0200
> >
> > > static values are automatically initialized to NULL
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:18:32PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Fabian Frederick
> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:16:36 +0200
>
> > static values are automatically initialized to NULL
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
>
> Isn't there some implementation room given to compilers
> as to t
On Di, 2014-10-07 at 16:18 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Fabian Frederick
> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:16:36 +0200
>
> > static values are automatically initialized to NULL
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
>
> Isn't there some implementation room given to compilers
> as to the repre
From: Fabian Frederick
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:16:36 +0200
> static values are automatically initialized to NULL
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
Isn't there some implementation room given to compilers
as to the representation of true and false?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
static values are automatically initialized to NULL
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
---
net/unix/garbage.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/garbage.c b/net/unix/garbage.c
index 9bc73f8..99f7012 100644
--- a/net/unix/garbage.c
+++ b/net/unix/garbage.c
@
11 matches
Mail list logo
