Re: [PATCH 1/1] thermal: of: improve of-thermal sensor registration API

Hey Lukasz, On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 08:38:57AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Eduardo, > > In the mail topic we have PATCH 1/1 but I think that it should be PATCH > v3 1/1. > Yeah, sent it without checking that. Fixing in V4, no issues. > > @@ -107,10 +106,7 @@ static int of_thermal_get

Re: [PATCH 1/1] thermal: of: improve of-thermal sensor registration API

Hi Eduardo, In the mail topic we have PATCH 1/1 but I think that it should be PATCH v3 1/1. > Different drivers request API extensions in of-thermal. For this > reason, additional callbacks are required to fit the new drivers > needs. > > The current API implementation expects the registering se

[PATCH 1/1] thermal: of: improve of-thermal sensor registration API

Different drivers request API extensions in of-thermal. For this reason, additional callbacks are required to fit the new drivers needs. The current API implementation expects the registering sensor driver to provide a get_temp and get_trend callbacks as function parameters. As the amount of callb

[PATCH 1/1] thermal: of: improve of-thermal sensor registration API

Different drivers request API extensions in of-thermal. For this reason, additional callbacks are required to fit the new drivers needs. The current API implementation expects the registering sensor driver to provide a get_temp and get_trend callbacks as function parameters. As the amount of callb