On 10/3/23 10:28 AM, Divin Raj wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for all review comments.
> It makes sense to incorporate a variable-length buffer size. However, we
> still require an implementation that can successfully achieve this objective.
>
> We will be investigating this matter and will return w
Hello,
Thanks for your patch.
Instead of having this in Kconfig, It's better to have buffer size decided
dynamically. Probably by resource-table.
We still need implementation that achieves that goal. Meanwhile I think it's
best to keep buffer size fixed.
Thanks.
On 9/28/23 10:38 AM, Divin R
Hi,
On 9/28/23 08:38, Divin Raj wrote:
> From: Peter Hoyes
>
> Replace the MAX_RPMSG_BUF_SIZE and MAX_RPMSG_NUM_BUFS #define in
> virtio_rpmsg_bus.c with the Kconfig parameters CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_BUF_SIZE
> and CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_MAX_NUM_BUFS, allowing user-provided customization.
>
> Making
From: Peter Hoyes
Replace the MAX_RPMSG_BUF_SIZE and MAX_RPMSG_NUM_BUFS #define in
virtio_rpmsg_bus.c with the Kconfig parameters CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_BUF_SIZE
and CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_MAX_NUM_BUFS, allowing user-provided customization.
Making both the number of buffers and size configurable facil
4 matches
Mail list logo