On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 at 07:35, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 10:40:30AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 03:28:11PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > > An iommu domain is allocated in rproc_enable_iommu() and is attached to
> > > rproc->dev.parent in the same f
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 10:40:30AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 03:28:11PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > An iommu domain is allocated in rproc_enable_iommu() and is attached to
> > rproc->dev.parent in the same function.
> >
> > Use iommu_paging_domain_alloc() to make it ex
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 03:28:11PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> An iommu domain is allocated in rproc_enable_iommu() and is attached to
> rproc->dev.parent in the same function.
>
> Use iommu_paging_domain_alloc() to make it explicit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe
> Lin
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 04:57:07PM +0530, Beleswar Prasad Padhi wrote:
> Since commit 17de3f5fdd35, the IOMMU framework has changed how it handles
> callback ops, moving away from using bus->iommu_ops. The omap-iommu driver
> has not yet been updated to align with these framework changes. Therefor
On 29-08-2024 11:47, Beleswar Prasad Padhi wrote:
Hi All,
On 22/08/24 21:47, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
Hi Baolu,
Sorry for the late reply, this slipped through the cracks.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 03:28:11PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> An iommu domain is allocated in rproc_enable_iommu() and is
a
On Sun, 15 Sept 2024 at 08:09, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 01:24:25PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:17:56AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >
> > > > - domain = iommu_domain_alloc(dev->bus);
> > > > - if (!domain) {
> > > > + domain = iommu_pag
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 01:24:25PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:17:56AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>
> > > - domain = iommu_domain_alloc(dev->bus);
> > > - if (!domain) {
> > > + domain = iommu_paging_domain_alloc(dev);
> >
> > I'm a little hesitant here. Functio
Hi All,
On 22/08/24 21:47, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
Hi Baolu,
Sorry for the late reply, this slipped through the cracks.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 03:28:11PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> An iommu domain is allocated in rproc_enable_iommu() and is attached to
> rproc->dev.parent in the same function.
>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:17:56AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > - domain = iommu_domain_alloc(dev->bus);
> > - if (!domain) {
> > + domain = iommu_paging_domain_alloc(dev);
>
> I'm a little hesitant here. Function iommu_domain_alloc() passes NULL two the
> second argument of __iommu_d
Hi Baolu,
Sorry for the late reply, this slipped through the cracks.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 03:28:11PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> An iommu domain is allocated in rproc_enable_iommu() and is attached to
> rproc->dev.parent in the same function.
>
> Use iommu_paging_domain_alloc() to make it explic
An iommu domain is allocated in rproc_enable_iommu() and is attached to
rproc->dev.parent in the same function.
Use iommu_paging_domain_alloc() to make it explicit.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2024061008.88197-13-baolu...@linux.intel.
11 matches
Mail list logo