On 2015-01-28 22:32, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 16:26 +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>> On 2015-01-28 10:54, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>> Now that we've been told Yann has disappeared, would you consider taking
>>> this patch into one of your trees? It would be nice to have people
>>> actually
On 2015-01-28 10:54, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Now that we've been told Yann has disappeared, would you consider taking
> this patch into one of your trees? It would be nice to have people
> actually use it for a while.
>
> Or should we first clean up (most of) the warnings it generates? There
It seems
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 16:26 +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 2015-01-28 10:54, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Now that we've been told Yann has disappeared, would you consider taking
> > this patch into one of your trees? It would be nice to have people
> > actually use it for a while.
> >
> > Or should we
Hi Yann,
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 20:09 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> A select of an unknown symbol is basically treated as a nop and is
> silently skipped. This is annoying if the selected symbol contains a
> typo. It can also hide the fact that a treewide symbol cleanup was only
> done partially.
>
>
A select of an unknown symbol is basically treated as a nop and is
silently skipped. This is annoying if the selected symbol contains a
typo. It can also hide the fact that a treewide symbol cleanup was only
done partially.
There are also a few cases were this might have been done on purpose.
But
5 matches
Mail list logo
