Hi Eduardo,
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 20:06 -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 12:00:57AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, May 04, 2016 02:54:32 PM Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 23:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > >
>
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 12:00:57AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 04, 2016 02:54:32 PM Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 23:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Eduardo Valentin > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Currently, in
On Wednesday, May 04, 2016 02:54:32 PM Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 23:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Eduardo Valentin > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently, in an ACPI based system, the processor driver registers
> > > one cooling device p
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 23:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Eduardo Valentin > wrote:
> >
> > Currently, in an ACPI based system, the processor driver registers
> > one cooling device per processor. However, the cooling device type
> > is the same for each proces
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Currently, in an ACPI based system, the processor driver registers
> one cooling device per processor. However, the cooling device type
> is the same for each processor. For example, on a system with four
> processors, the sysfs reading of
Currently, in an ACPI based system, the processor driver registers
one cooling device per processor. However, the cooling device type
is the same for each processor. For example, on a system with four
processors, the sysfs reading of each cooling device would look like:
ebv@besouro ~ $ cat /sys/cla
6 matches
Mail list logo