Re: [PATCH 1/1] 6lowpan: Fix fragmentation with link-local compressed addresses

2013-05-19 Thread Alexander Aring
Hi David, I will try to figure out why link-layer address doesn't work on my setup. On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:14:48AM +0200, David Hauweele wrote: > Hello, > > There is a patch which fixes link-local address uncompression: > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network.zigbee.devel/1717 >

Re: [PATCH 1/1] 6lowpan: Fix fragmentation with link-local compressed addresses

2013-05-19 Thread David Hauweele
Hello, There is a patch which fixes link-local address uncompression: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network.zigbee.devel/1717 I came across a similar solution but didn't submit it as another patch already existed. This patch instead focus on fragmented packet with link-local address com

Re: [PATCH 1/1] 6lowpan: Fix fragmentation with link-local compressed addresses

2013-05-19 Thread Alexander Aring
Hi David, can you use a link-layer address on the current net-next kernel? I am asking because I can't use a link-layer address currently. Your patch doesn't help to solve my problem with link-layer addresses. To your patch: We get the link-layer addresses from skb not from the allocated frame

[PATCH 1/1] 6lowpan: Fix fragmentation with link-local compressed addresses

2013-05-19 Thread David Hauweele
When a new 6lowpan fragment is received, a skbuff is allocated for the reassembled packet. However when a 6lowpan packet compresses link-local addresses based on link-layer addresses, the processing function relies on the skb mac control block to find the related link-layer address. This patch cop