Re: [PATCH 09/22] ARM: LPAE: use 64-bit pgd physical address in switch_mm()

2012-08-05 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote: > On 8/4/2012 3:04 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote: > > > > > This patch modifies the switch_mm() processor functions to use 64-bit > > > addresses. We use u64 instead of phys_addr_t, in order to avoid having

Re: [PATCH 09/22] ARM: LPAE: use 64-bit pgd physical address in switch_mm()

2012-08-05 Thread Cyril Chemparathy
On 8/4/2012 3:04 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote: This patch modifies the switch_mm() processor functions to use 64-bit addresses. We use u64 instead of phys_addr_t, in order to avoid having config dependent register usage when calling into switch_mm assem

Re: [PATCH 09/22] ARM: LPAE: use 64-bit pgd physical address in switch_mm()

2012-08-04 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote: > This patch modifies the switch_mm() processor functions to use 64-bit > addresses. We use u64 instead of phys_addr_t, in order to avoid having config > dependent register usage when calling into switch_mm assembly code. > > The changes in this patc

[PATCH 09/22] ARM: LPAE: use 64-bit pgd physical address in switch_mm()

2012-07-31 Thread Cyril Chemparathy
This patch modifies the switch_mm() processor functions to use 64-bit addresses. We use u64 instead of phys_addr_t, in order to avoid having config dependent register usage when calling into switch_mm assembly code. The changes in this patch are primarily adjustments for registers used for argume