Re: [PATCH 08/23] clocksource: drop duplicate register checking

2007-01-31 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > if (is_registered_source(c)) { > > printk("register_clocksource: Cannot register %s. " > > "Already registered!", c->name); > > ret = -EBUSY; > > > > and Thomas' change keeps that pr

Re: [PATCH 08/23] clocksource: drop duplicate register checking

2007-01-31 Thread Daniel Walker
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 10:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is something Thomas already dropped, [...] > > (i think you forgot to Cc: Thomas here, nor is this something that > Thomas' change dropped.) Yes your right . > > [...] and I'm just sti

Re: [PATCH 08/23] clocksource: drop duplicate register checking

2007-01-31 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is something Thomas already dropped, [...] (i think you forgot to Cc: Thomas here, nor is this something that Thomas' change dropped.) > [...] and I'm just sticking with that .. If you register your > clocksource _twice_ your kernel will likel

[PATCH 08/23] clocksource: drop duplicate register checking

2007-01-30 Thread Daniel Walker
This is something Thomas already dropped, and I'm just sticking with that .. If you register your clocksource _twice_ your kernel will likely not work correctly (and might crash). Signed-Off-By: Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- kernel/time/clocksource.c | 19 ++- 1 file ch