Re: [PATCH 08/10] pwm: core: add pulse feature to the PWM framework

2015-11-06 Thread Olliver Schinagl
Hey Thierry, On 06-11-15 17:05, Thierry Reding wrote: On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:46:54PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: Hey Thierry, On 06-11-15 16:18, Thierry Reding wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:32:39PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: From: Olliver Schinagl Some hardware PWM's have th

Re: [PATCH 08/10] pwm: core: add pulse feature to the PWM framework

2015-11-06 Thread Thierry Reding
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:46:54PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > Hey Thierry, > > On 06-11-15 16:18, Thierry Reding wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:32:39PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > >>From: Olliver Schinagl > >> > >>Some hardware PWM's have the possibility to only send out one (or

Re: [PATCH 08/10] pwm: core: add pulse feature to the PWM framework

2015-11-06 Thread Olliver Schinagl
Hey Thierry, On 06-11-15 16:18, Thierry Reding wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:32:39PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: From: Olliver Schinagl Some hardware PWM's have the possibility to only send out one (or more) pulses. This can be quite a useful feature in case one wants or needs only a s

Re: [PATCH 08/10] pwm: core: add pulse feature to the PWM framework

2015-11-06 Thread Thierry Reding
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:32:39PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > From: Olliver Schinagl > > Some hardware PWM's have the possibility to only send out one (or more) > pulses. This can be quite a useful feature in case one wants or needs > only a single pulse, but at the exact width. > > Additi

Re: [PATCH 08/10] pwm: core: add pulse feature to the PWM framework

2015-10-26 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Olliver, [auto build test WARNING on pwm/for-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Olliver-Schinagl/pwm-lpc18xx_pwm-use-pwm_set_chip_data/20151027-053853 reproduce: # apt-get ins

Re: [PATCH 08/10] pwm: core: add pulse feature to the PWM framework

2015-10-26 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Olliver, [auto build test WARNING on pwm/for-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Olliver-Schinagl/pwm-lpc18xx_pwm-use-pwm_set_chip_data/20151027-053853 config: arm-at91_dt_defconfig (a

Re: [PATCH 08/10] pwm: core: add pulse feature to the PWM framework

2015-10-26 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Olliver, [auto build test ERROR on pwm/for-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Olliver-Schinagl/pwm-lpc18xx_pwm-use-pwm_set_chip_data/20151027-053853 config: i386-randconfig-s1-201543

Re: [PATCH 08/10] pwm: core: add pulse feature to the PWM framework

2015-10-26 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Olliver, [auto build test WARNING on pwm/for-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Olliver-Schinagl/pwm-lpc18xx_pwm-use-pwm_set_chip_data/20151027-053853 config: avr32-atstk1006_defconfi

Re: [PATCH 08/10] pwm: core: add pulse feature to the PWM framework

2015-10-26 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Olliver, [auto build test ERROR on pwm/for-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Olliver-Schinagl/pwm-lpc18xx_pwm-use-pwm_set_chip_data/20151027-053853 config: x86_64-randconfig-n0-10270

[PATCH 08/10] pwm: core: add pulse feature to the PWM framework

2015-10-26 Thread Olliver Schinagl
From: Olliver Schinagl Some hardware PWM's have the possibility to only send out one (or more) pulses. This can be quite a useful feature in case one wants or needs only a single pulse, but at the exact width. Additionally, if multiple pulses are possible, outputting a fixed amount of pulses can