On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:11:50PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > I never said the change didn't make sense as such. Just that we're no
> > longer counting pages in change_*_range().
>
> well, it's still a THP page. Is it worth renaming?
Dunno, the pedant in me needed to raise the issue :-)
--
To u
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 04:54:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 09:39:59AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On 09/16/2013 08:36 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:31:47AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > >> A THP PMD update is accounted for as 512 pages u
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 09:39:59AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 09/16/2013 08:36 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:31:47AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >> A THP PMD update is accounted for as 512 pages updated in vmstat. This is
> >> large difference when estimating the cos
On 09/16/2013 08:36 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:31:47AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> A THP PMD update is accounted for as 512 pages updated in vmstat. This is
>> large difference when estimating the cost of automatic NUMA balancing and
>> can be misleading when comparing
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:31:47AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> A THP PMD update is accounted for as 512 pages updated in vmstat. This is
> large difference when estimating the cost of automatic NUMA balancing and
> can be misleading when comparing results that had collapsed versus split
> THP. This
A THP PMD update is accounted for as 512 pages updated in vmstat. This is
large difference when estimating the cost of automatic NUMA balancing and
can be misleading when comparing results that had collapsed versus split
THP. This patch addresses the accounting issue.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
-
6 matches
Mail list logo