On Sun, 1 Apr 2007, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On Apr 01, 2007, at 14:42:59, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> ... The point is to encourage the average kernel builder not to
> change from one of the default options unless they really know what
> they're doing.
conversely, if someone truly wants to set a kerne
On Apr 1 2007 14:52, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>
> On Apr 01, 2007, at 14:42:59, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> But I would have to ask: Why do we need 100/250/300/1000 if there
>> is anyway an input field for the user to enter - s/he should read
>> the help text for Known Good values, should not s/he?
>
> Ac
On Apr 01, 2007, at 14:42:59, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
But I would have to ask: Why do we need 100/250/300/1000 if there
is anyway an input field for the user to enter - s/he should read
the help text for Known Good values, should not s/he?
Actually, probably what should be done is make the "HZ
On Apr 1 2007 14:39, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>>
>> Make HZ fully configurable through menuconfig.
>>
>> Already posted at http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/18/111
>
> Instead of that, what about something like this instead: NOTE: I know my
> mailer mangles diffs and this one was hand-edited based on Jan'
On Apr 01, 2007, at 14:15:20, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Make HZ fully configurable through menuconfig.
Already posted at http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/18/111
Instead of that, what about something like this instead: NOTE: I
know my mailer mangles diffs and this one was hand-edited based on
Jan'
Make HZ fully configurable through menuconfig.
Already posted at http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/18/111
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt
Cc: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/8/307)
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kconfig.hz | 70 +++
6 matches
Mail list logo
