On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Jason Wessel
wrote:
> On 03/11/2013 09:09 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> This is Jason's code.
>>
>> Jason, please give an Ack or Nack.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -- Steve
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 15:13 +0800, zhangwei(Jovi) wrote:
>>> trace_empty is checking in whil
On 03/11/2013 09:09 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> This is Jason's code.
>
> Jason, please give an Ack or Nack.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve
>
>
> On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 15:13 +0800, zhangwei(Jovi) wrote:
>> trace_empty is checking in while-loop, so the previous checking
>> is totally redundant, and more w
This is Jason's code.
Jason, please give an Ack or Nack.
Thanks,
-- Steve
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 15:13 +0800, zhangwei(Jovi) wrote:
> trace_empty is checking in while-loop, so the previous checking
> is totally redundant, and more worse, the first trace entry is losted.
>
> so remove it.
>
>
trace_empty is checking in while-loop, so the previous checking
is totally redundant, and more worse, the first trace entry is losted.
so remove it.
Signed-off-by: zhangwei(Jovi)
---
kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c |3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/t
4 matches
Mail list logo