On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 01:31:44PM +, Priit Laes wrote:
> Yes, makes sense. Although, should we then also distinguish between
> regulators which support soft-start in hardware and devices which emulate
> it by delay, like in this case?
Drivers should not be emulating soft start, if they need
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:36:19AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:27:47PM +0200, Priit Laes wrote:
> > From: Olliver Schinagl
> >
> > In the past, there have been words on various lists that if LDO3 is
> > disabled in u-boot, but enabled in the DTS, the axp209 driver wou
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:27:47PM +0200, Priit Laes wrote:
> From: Olliver Schinagl
>
> In the past, there have been words on various lists that if LDO3 is
> disabled in u-boot, but enabled in the DTS, the axp209 driver would
> fail to continue/hang. Several enable/disable patches have been
> is
From: Olliver Schinagl
In the past, there have been words on various lists that if LDO3 is
disabled in u-boot, but enabled in the DTS, the axp209 driver would
fail to continue/hang. Several enable/disable patches have been
issues to devicetree's in both the kernel and u-boot to address
this issue
4 matches
Mail list logo
