On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 05:42:41PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 14 September 2012, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
> > > so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
> > >
On Friday 14 September 2012, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
> > so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
> >
> > This found a bug in mach-armadillo5x0.c, where we attempt mmio
> > on
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
> so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
>
> This found a bug in mach-armadillo5x0.c, where we attempt mmio
> on the MXC_CCM_RCSR address that is currently defined to 0xc
> a
ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
This found a bug in mach-armadillo5x0.c, where we attempt mmio
on the MXC_CCM_RCSR address that is currently defined to 0xc
and consequently causes an illegal address access.
Signed-off-by:
4 matches
Mail list logo