Re: [PATCH 05/21] atm: he: use mdelay instead of large udelay constants

2013-04-26 Thread chas williams - CONTRACTOR
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:21:59 +0100 "David Laight" wrote: > > ARM cannot handle udelay for more than 2 miliseconds, so we > > should use mdelay instead for those. > ... > > @@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static int he_start(struct atm_dev *dev) > > he_writel(he_dev, 0x0, RESET_CNTL); > > he_writel(

RE: [PATCH 05/21] atm: he: use mdelay instead of large udelay constants

2013-04-26 Thread David Laight
> ARM cannot handle udelay for more than 2 miliseconds, so we > should use mdelay instead for those. ... > @@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static int he_start(struct atm_dev *dev) > he_writel(he_dev, 0x0, RESET_CNTL); > he_writel(he_dev, 0xff, RESET_CNTL); > > - udelay(16*1000);/* 16

[PATCH 05/21] atm: he: use mdelay instead of large udelay constants

2013-04-25 Thread Arnd Bergmann
ARM cannot handle udelay for more than 2 miliseconds, so we should use mdelay instead for those. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Chas Williams Cc: linux-atm-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/atm/he.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff