On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 02:07:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 07:37:31PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > When we enqueue a remote irq work, we trigger the same IPI as those
> > raised by smp_call_function_*() family.
> >
> > So when we receive such IPI, we check b
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 02:07:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 07:37:31PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > When we enqueue a remote irq work, we trigger the same IPI as those
> > raised by smp_call_function_*() family.
> >
> > So when we receive such IPI, we check b
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 07:37:31PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> When we enqueue a remote irq work, we trigger the same IPI as those
> raised by smp_call_function_*() family.
>
> So when we receive such IPI, we check both irq_work and smp_call_function
> queues. Thus if we trigger a remote i
When we enqueue a remote irq work, we trigger the same IPI as those
raised by smp_call_function_*() family.
So when we receive such IPI, we check both irq_work and smp_call_function
queues. Thus if we trigger a remote irq work, we'll likely find the
smp_call_function queue empty unless we collide
When we enqueue a remote irq work, we trigger the same IPI as those
raised by smp_call_function_*() family.
So when we receive such IPI, we check both irq_work and smp_call_function
queues. Thus if we trigger a remote irq work, we'll likely find the
smp_call_function queue empty unless we collide
5 matches
Mail list logo