Re: [PATCH 04/34] clk: bcm2835: Migrate to clk_hw based registration and OF APIs

On 06/02, Eric Anholt wrote: > Stephen Boyd writes: > > > Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we > > can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in > > these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of > > consumer and provider clk APIs. > > Th

Re: [PATCH 04/34] clk: bcm2835: Migrate to clk_hw based registration and OF APIs

Stephen Boyd writes: > Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we > can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in > these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of > consumer and provider clk APIs. This looks good, but it'll conflict with the fi

[PATCH 04/34] clk: bcm2835: Migrate to clk_hw based registration and OF APIs

Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of consumer and provider clk APIs. Cc: Eric Anholt Cc: Martin Sperl Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd --- See commi