Re: [PATCH 04/22] ARM: LPAE: support 64-bit virt/phys patching

2012-08-05 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > On 8/4/2012 2:49 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote: > > > > > This patch adds support for 64-bit physical addresses in virt_to_phys > > > patching. This does not do real 64-bit add/sub, but in

Re: [PATCH 04/22] ARM: LPAE: support 64-bit virt/phys patching

2012-08-05 Thread Cyril Chemparathy
Hi Nicolas, On 8/4/2012 2:49 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote: This patch adds support for 64-bit physical addresses in virt_to_phys patching. This does not do real 64-bit add/sub, but instead patches in the upper 32-bits of the phys_offset directly into t

Re: [PATCH 04/22] ARM: LPAE: support 64-bit virt/phys patching

2012-08-03 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote: > This patch adds support for 64-bit physical addresses in virt_to_phys > patching. This does not do real 64-bit add/sub, but instead patches in the > upper 32-bits of the phys_offset directly into the output of virt_to_phys. You should explain _why_

[PATCH 04/22] ARM: LPAE: support 64-bit virt/phys patching

2012-07-31 Thread Cyril Chemparathy
This patch adds support for 64-bit physical addresses in virt_to_phys patching. This does not do real 64-bit add/sub, but instead patches in the upper 32-bits of the phys_offset directly into the output of virt_to_phys. In addition to adding 64-bit support, this patch also adds a set_phys_offset(