On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 17:24:24 +0100 Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:14:46AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
> > around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocati
On Wed 01-06-16 17:24:24, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:14:46AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
> > around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.
> >
>
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:14:46AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
> around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.
>
> PGALLOC_GFP uses __GFP_REPEAT but none of the allocation which uses
>
From: Michal Hocko
__GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.
PGALLOC_GFP uses __GFP_REPEAT but none of the allocation which uses
this flag is for more than order-2. This means that this flag has never
bee
4 matches
Mail list logo