On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:09:23PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > Why do we still need TRANSPORT_LUNFLAGS_INITIATOR_ACCESS? Isn't deve
> > being not-NULL enough?
> >
>
> Yep, I think this can go as well. Dropping now.
Also might be worth to add a helper that has the ->se_lun_acl check
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 13:58 -0700, Andy Grover wrote:
> On 05/12/2015 02:25 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger
> >
> > This patch converts fabric independent configfs link/unlink to use
> > RCU read path macros for se_node_acl->lun_entry_hlist access.
> >
> > It also con
On 05/12/2015 02:25 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
From: Nicholas Bellinger
This patch converts fabric independent configfs link/unlink to use
RCU read path macros for se_node_acl->lun_entry_hlist access.
It also converts SCSI MIB configfs show attribute code to use
RCU read path macros for
From: Nicholas Bellinger
This patch converts fabric independent configfs link/unlink to use
RCU read path macros for se_node_acl->lun_entry_hlist access.
It also converts SCSI MIB configfs show attribute code to use
RCU read path macros for se_node_acl->lun_entry_hlist access.
Cc: Hannes Reinec
4 matches
Mail list logo