Re: [PATCH 02/21] fs: remove inline marking of EXPORT_SYMBOL functions

2013-05-09 Thread Denis
On 09.05.2013 12:07, Al Viro wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:58:24AM +0400, Denis Efremov wrote: EXPORT_SYMBOL and inline directives are contradictory to each other. The patch fixes this inconsistency. What makes them contradictory, in your opinion? With references to relevant parts of C99,

Re: [PATCH 02/21] fs: remove inline marking of EXPORT_SYMBOL functions

2013-05-09 Thread Al Viro
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:58:24AM +0400, Denis Efremov wrote: > EXPORT_SYMBOL and inline directives are contradictory to each other. > The patch fixes this inconsistency. What makes them contradictory, in your opinion? With references to relevant parts of C99, please. -- To unsubscribe from this

[PATCH 02/21] fs: remove inline marking of EXPORT_SYMBOL functions

2013-05-09 Thread Denis Efremov
EXPORT_SYMBOL and inline directives are contradictory to each other. The patch fixes this inconsistency. Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org). Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov --- fs/bio.c | 2 +- fs/block_dev.c | 2 +- fs/buffer.c| 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insert