On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> This is a common problem with the current OF code that numbers INTx from
> 1 instead of zero (there is no 5th legacy interrupts in the PCI spec,
> despite what $SUBJECT says). I'd be inclined to fix this at the core
> level rather than papering
+ Bjorn
On 06/06/17 23:59, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> From: "Wesley W. Terpstra"
>
> These are numbered from 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c b/
CC pci folks
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> From: "Wesley W. Terpstra"
>
> These are numbered from 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host
From: "Wesley W. Terpstra"
These are numbered from 1.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt
---
drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c
index 2fe2df51f9f8..8804145d399a 100644
4 matches
Mail list logo