Re: [PATCH 00/45] Automatic NUMA Balancing V7

2012-12-10 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
> > > > Got a chance to run autonuma-benchmark on a 8 node, 64 core machine. > > the results are as below. (for each kernel I ran 5 iterations of > > autonuma-benchmark) > > > > Thanks, a test of v10 would also be appreciated. The differences between > V7 and V10 are small but do include a chan

Re: [PATCH 00/45] Automatic NUMA Balancing V7

2012-12-10 Thread Mel Gorman
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 04:15:39PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > Got a chance to run autonuma-benchmark on a 8 node, 64 core machine. > the results are as below. (for each kernel I ran 5 iterations of > autonuma-benchmark) > Thanks, a test of v10 would also be appreciated. The differences

Re: [PATCH 00/45] Automatic NUMA Balancing V7

2012-12-07 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
Got a chance to run autonuma-benchmark on a 8 node, 64 core machine. the results are as below. (for each kernel I ran 5 iterations of autonuma-benchmark) KernelVersion: 3.7.0-rc3-mainline_v37rc7() Testcase: Min Max Avg numa01: 156

[PATCH 00/45] Automatic NUMA Balancing V7

2012-11-28 Thread Mel Gorman
Like V6, I'm only posting the git tree reference instead of sending out a flood of emails as the differences are small. The v7 release is justified by a page count reference bug identified and fixed by Hillf Danton in the transhuge migration patch. I'll send the full series if people would prefer