Re: [PATCH 00/38] tick cleanups and bugfixes

2014-04-14 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 15 April 2014 05:08, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > And that's wrong to begin with. > > Bugfixes first and then all other stuff. We dont want dependencies of > bugfixes on cleanups, reordering of code ... Correct, should have taken care of this initially :( > Now looking at the thing some more, it

Re: [PATCH 00/38] tick cleanups and bugfixes

2014-04-14 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > These are separate cleanups from the timers/hrtimers ones I did. I was waiting > for the merge window to close in order to send these and by the time it > happened, I got a long pending list. > > These are mostly cleanups, reorders for bet

[PATCH 00/38] tick cleanups and bugfixes

2014-04-14 Thread Viresh Kumar
Hi Thomas, These are separate cleanups from the timers/hrtimers ones I did. I was waiting for the merge window to close in order to send these and by the time it happened, I got a long pending list. These are mostly cleanups, reorders for better readability or efficiency, and few bugfixes. I hav