Re: [PATCH 00/26] Eliminate create_proc_read_entry() [RFC]

2013-04-12 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:34:21PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > > The ones I've been cc:ed on, with the exception of the hostap patch, I > > will be glad to take though my trees now, unless you want to take them > > yourself? > > If Al is happy with it, he might want to take

Re: [PATCH 00/26] Eliminate create_proc_read_entry() [RFC]

2013-04-11 Thread David Howells
Greg KH wrote: > The ones I've been cc:ed on, with the exception of the hostap patch, I > will be glad to take though my trees now, unless you want to take them > yourself? If Al is happy with it, he might want to take it through his tree since it's sat on top of his experimental branch - especi

Re: [PATCH 00/26] Eliminate create_proc_read_entry() [RFC]

2013-04-11 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:27:40PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > > Here is a series of patches to eliminate create_proc_read_entry(), replacing > it > with proc_create() and proc_create_data() and the use of seq_file facilities. > > This requires file_operations structs and open methods to be pr

Re: [PATCH 00/26] Eliminate create_proc_read_entry() [RFC]

2013-04-11 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 11 April 2013, David Howells wrote: > > Here is a series of patches to eliminate create_proc_read_entry(), replacing > it > with proc_create() and proc_create_data() and the use of seq_file facilities. > These patches can be seen here also: > > > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/lin

[PATCH 00/26] Eliminate create_proc_read_entry() [RFC]

2013-04-11 Thread David Howells
Here is a series of patches to eliminate create_proc_read_entry(), replacing it with proc_create() and proc_create_data() and the use of seq_file facilities. This requires file_operations structs and open methods to be provided in most cases, though single_open() and single_open_size() suffice fo