Note the slab has a memory tracking feature that accounts memory to
callers of the allocator. IF that's not enough for you please help
improving the common code instead of inventing your own.
Christoph that code was written over 6-7 years ago, feel free to provide a
patch for it to use the sl
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:20:32PM -0400, Kristian H?gsberg wrote:
> > The wrappers aren't useless the drm alloc/free passes in a memory space
> > for debugging purposes so we can track memory abuse when developing,
>
> Do we ever use that, though? Having to pass in the pointer, the size
> and t
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 21:50 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:57:50PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>As there are many places in drm code where drm_alloc + memset is used
> >> this patch series intr
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:57:50PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
As there are many places in drm code where drm_alloc + memset is used
this patch series introduces drm_zalloc and also makes use of drm_calloc where
needed. Most of t
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:57:50PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As there are many places in drm code where drm_alloc + memset is used
> this patch series introduces drm_zalloc and also makes use of drm_calloc where
> needed. Most of these patches save some bytes so the benefi
Hello,
As there are many places in drm code where drm_alloc + memset is used
this patch series introduces drm_zalloc and also makes use of drm_calloc where
needed. Most of these patches save some bytes so the benefit is a few kB saved
(gcc 4.1.2) with patch applied. Also some small (style,
6 matches
Mail list logo
