Re: [PATCH 00/19] x86, mpx updates for 4.2 (take 8)

2015-06-01 Thread Dave Hansen
On 06/01/2015 04:14 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > So you already sent 'take 8', so it's unclear to me what changed in this > series. > > Also, only 1,3,4,5 made it to lkml it appears. (it's not in my spam box > either.) I accidentally send that. I'll send a real series with a proper changelog short

Re: [PATCH 00/19] x86, mpx updates for 4.2 (take 8)

2015-06-01 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Dave Hansen wrote: > > Changes from take 7 / v22: > * Add Thomas's reviewed-by > * merge with tip/x86/fpu changes > * Fix tiny spelling nit So you already sent 'take 8', so it's unclear to me what changed in this series. Also, only 1,3,4,5 made it to lkml it appears. (it's not in my spam

[PATCH 00/19] x86, mpx updates for 4.2 (take 8)

2015-05-29 Thread Dave Hansen
Changes from take 7 / v22: * Add Thomas's reviewed-by * merge with tip/x86/fpu changes * Fix tiny spelling nit Changes from take 6 / v21: * Address a bunch of Thomas's review comments. Changes from take 5 / v20: * Fix get_xsave_addr() to consult xstate_bv in anticipation of fixes to xsa

[PATCH 00/19] x86, mpx updates for 4.2 (take 8)

2015-05-27 Thread Dave Hansen
Changes from take 7 / v22: * Add Thomas's reviewed-by * merge with tip/x86/fpu changes * Fix tiny spelling nit Changes from take 6 / v21: * Address a bunch of Thomas's review comments. Changes from take 5 / v20: * Fix get_xsave_addr() to consult xstate_bv in anticipation of fixes to xsa