On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> On omaps, each bank is a separate driver instance with it's own
> interrupt. Maybe really all we need to do is get rid of the "bank"
> naming, I think that's left over from 15 years ago when we did not
> have separate driver instances. It se
On 09/15/2017 11:57 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Thierry Reding [170915 08:10]:
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 03:54:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> Sorry about that. Let's move ahead with this now, it is neat and
>>> clean.
>>>
>>> What I want (as maintainer) is a bit of fingerpointing at the
* Thierry Reding [170915 08:10]:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 03:54:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > Sorry about that. Let's move ahead with this now, it is neat and
> > clean.
> >
> > What I want (as maintainer) is a bit of fingerpointing at the drivers
> > that need to be converted to use the
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 03:54:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
>
> > here's the latest series of patches that implement the tighter IRQ chip
> > integration as well as the banked GPIO infrastructure that we had
> > discussed a couple of w
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> here's the latest series of patches that implement the tighter IRQ chip
> integration as well as the banked GPIO infrastructure that we had
> discussed a couple of weeks/months back.
Yes it has become really tasty now, don't you think :)
I
From: Thierry Reding
Hi Linus,
here's the latest series of patches that implement the tighter IRQ chip
integration as well as the banked GPIO infrastructure that we had
discussed a couple of weeks/months back.
The first couple of patches are mostly preparatory work in order to
consolidate all I
6 matches
Mail list logo
