Re: [PATCH 00/10] CGroup API files: Various cleanup to CGroup control files

Paul Menage wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Li Zefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Should those pathces be rebased againt 2.6.25-rc3 ? >> > > No, because they're against 2.6.25-rc2-mm1, which is already has (I > think) any of the new bits in 2.6.25-rc3 that would be affected by > these

Re: [PATCH 00/10] CGroup API files: Various cleanup to CGroup control files

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Li Zefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should those pathces be rebased againt 2.6.25-rc3 ? > No, because they're against 2.6.25-rc2-mm1, which is already has (I think) any of the new bits in 2.6.25-rc3 that would be affected by these patches. Paul -- To unsubscr

Re: [PATCH 00/10] CGroup API files: Various cleanup to CGroup control files

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This patchset is a roll-up of the non-contraversial items of the > various patches that I've sent out recently, fixed according to the > feedback received. > > In summary they are: > > - general rename of read_uint/write_uint to read_u64/write_u64 > > - use these metho

[PATCH 00/10] CGroup API files: Various cleanup to CGroup control files

This patchset is a roll-up of the non-contraversial items of the various patches that I've sent out recently, fixed according to the feedback received. In summary they are: - general rename of read_uint/write_uint to read_u64/write_u64 - use these methods for cpusets and memory controller files