Re: [PATCH 0/8] make hugetlb put_page safe for all calling contexts

2021-03-26 Thread Mike Kravetz
On 3/25/21 6:42 PM, Miaohe Lin wrote: > Hi: > On 2021/3/25 8:28, Mike Kravetz wrote: >> This effort is the result a recent bug report [1]. In subsequent >> discussions [2], it was deemed necessary to properly fix the hugetlb > > Many thanks for the effort. I have read the discussions and it is pr

Re: [PATCH 0/8] make hugetlb put_page safe for all calling contexts

2021-03-25 Thread Miaohe Lin
Hi: On 2021/3/25 8:28, Mike Kravetz wrote: > This effort is the result a recent bug report [1]. In subsequent > discussions [2], it was deemed necessary to properly fix the hugetlb Many thanks for the effort. I have read the discussions and it is pretty long. Maybe it would be helpful if you give

[PATCH 0/8] make hugetlb put_page safe for all calling contexts

2021-03-24 Thread Mike Kravetz
This effort is the result a recent bug report [1]. In subsequent discussions [2], it was deemed necessary to properly fix the hugetlb put_page path (free_huge_page). This RFC provides a possible way to address the issue. Comments are welcome/encouraged as several attempts at this have been made

[RFC PATCH 0/8] make hugetlb put_page safe for all calling contexts

2021-03-19 Thread Mike Kravetz
This effort is the result a recent bug report [1]. In subsequent discussions [2], it was deemed necessary to properly fix the hugetlb put_page path (free_huge_page). This RFC provides a possible way to address the issue. Comments are welcome/encouraged as several attempts at this have been made